Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles – and then….

I recently finished watching The Sarah Conner Chronicles. I watched it a few years back but was curious to watch the ending again. I remembered that John had jumped forward to the future and then the series ending. I rewatched it from the beginning, and was pleasantly reminded that it’s a pretty good show. There are a few slow episodes and the odd weird choice (like late in S2 when there is an episode that is between Sarah in the back of a van being interrogated and her in a mental hospital). But overall its interesting and it certainly finished as a cliffhanger!

And that’s what most of this is about… what we know in the end.

So in the final moments, John and the Catherine Weaver (the liquid metal) jumped forward. She disappeared as John met his uncle. His uncle and his father, and neither know who John Conner is. He’s clearly not the leader of the resistance. Enough has been altered in the past to wipe his part out. And as the screen goes black, we are left with Cameron, or by the reaction of the dogs, the human who gave Cameron her form. She clearly doesn’t recognise John either.

The future has changed a lot.

We also know that the Cromartie body, with Cameron’s chip inside is already here. But is it the protector Cameron, or due to damage in her prison assault has she defaulted to her Terminator programming? She hinted at this earlier in the episode. That doesn’t seem quite right as she probably would have laid waste to any humans she came across in the future, which doesn’t seem to have happened. What if it is actually John Henry in this chip? We have no idea what he might do… or a mix of them both, or of John Henry and the default Terminator. Who in the future would appear to be hunting someone who didn’t actually matter.

But the Catherine Weaver Liquid Metal knows what happened in the future, or at least one version of the future. Remember she mentioned the “No I won’t join you” interaction from her, Jessie and Cameron in the past. And it seemed as if the other Terminators from Skynet were attempting to destroy her, so they are enemies? So now we have two Terminator factions.

Or are they two Skynets, but from different futures? Or were the new Terminators just targeting the Weaver faction, simply because they identified John Henry and decided it was a threat.

But if the second Skynet isn’t being opposed by John, then why did it carry out such an elaborate hit, to hit them all? Or again, there were standing orders to eliminate any other Terminators around… and they were actually after Cameron – that doesn’t fit, they left her behind to snatch Derek.

Did the Catherine Weaver recognise John or Sarah? I am not entirely sure. I think she didn’t recognise John, though at the psychiatrist’s office, they may not have actually seen each other. Seems odd for a Terminator not to assess everyone they have around them. But then she must know who he was, or how would she know about the joining interchange.

I am really stumped with what might have happened next. Someone, not John, was clearly in charge of the Resistance. Kyle was still alive, so going back to protect Sarah hasn’t happened? That’s why John isn’t the “Great Leader’. So are the other Terminators (not the Weaver faction) after a new “Great Leader”. Who is this? And is it because John jumped forward and not lived forwards…..

Time travel always makes for problems.

Anyway, I just wanted to dump my thoughts here. It was a well done show, and I would have loved to have seen what happened next. I am sure it wouldn’t have answered every question and tied it all up nicely.

But life is messy.

As an added weird thought…. What do we do with all of these Terminators littered through history all with perhaps slightly different “stories of the future past”. What if Cameron, Cromartie, Uncle Arnie, Evil Arnie, the other Terminators from the Chronicles, and the TWO liquid metals. What if they all ended up meeting somewhere, kind of like the Dark Fate movie. What a mess. And Derek, his team, Jessie and even Kyle…

Marvel’s Agents of well not zzz

I have an apology to make. Way back in 2013 I posted my thoughts on the (at the time) new Marvel series. I wasn’t too impressed.

However, I’m deep into the third series, and while it’s not the best show ever (The Expanse is one of my picks for that), it is worth watching. So I don’t fully retract my comments at the time, but I’m enjoying it.

I didn’t like the lead hero, who turned out to be a bad guy (maybe I knew). And I kind of still don’t. It is still awesome to see Ming-Na (to the best of my knowledge the only Star Wars character, Marvel hero and Disney Princess – though technically the wife of a General doesn’t make her a princess).

But the stories have evolved from what I felt was like a bad guy/alien of the week to a series of engaging story arcs. It does and it doesn’t link in parts of the movie series. I’m not sure yet if it relates to the Inhuman series as well (I’ve had the same with that… it was watchable, but I didn’t really get into the show).

So worth a watch if you’ve been watching other parts of the Marvel universe. And probably engaging even if you haven’t.

Marvel’s Agents of zzzzz….

marvels_agents_of_shield_640_large_verge_medium_landscapeOk, this was going to be a review, but I think my title sums up my opinion pretty quickly. I don’t know about you guys but I find it pretty boring.

It’s great to see Ming-na on screen again, but that’s not enough for me to keep watching. I got through two and a half episodes, but not interested enough to finish the third one.

The stories are pretty simple, there’s little tension and it seems to have little imagination in it. The Fitz-Simmons characters grate and the action man guy is awful. Still I suppose they are supposed to comic book folks, but that doesn’t mean one dimensional these days.

So I won’t be watching it. Still watching Heroes anyway, and there’s no way MAoS compares to the twists and performances in that show.

Random Trivia – Sherlock revisited

Here’s something random I just discovered. The BBC show Sherlock that I talked about here, Sherlock is played by Benedict Cumberbatch, who will appear shortly as the villain in the new Star Trek movie and plays the voice of Smaug (I think I said that in the other post), but Dr Watson, played by Martin Freeman, is none other than Bilbo Baggins from The Hobbit, and was also Arthur Dent in The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

It’s Elementary, Sherlock.

An interesting coincidence has occurred in my viewing. Recently I discovered the BBC short series “Sherlock”, a modern interpretation of the Sherlock stories. Produced as 2 (so far) series of three 90 minute episodes it has Sherlock doing his deduction work in modern day London. Dr Watson is a recovering (retired? reservist?) British Army doctor who has served in Afghanistan. Sherlock is played by Benedict Cumberbatch who we will see as the villain in the new Star Trek movie and is the voice of Smaug in The Hobbit. (Note, the original Dr Watson was also a British Army doctor who served in Afghanistan, as at the time of his novels, that’s where the wars had been in Sir Conan Doyle’s time…. 125 years later and the British Army and others are there again!)

sherlock Then, Channel Ten has started showing “Elementary”. This is a US produced show, with Sherlock doing his deduction work in modern day New York. This time Dr Watson, played by the lovely Lucy Liu, is a Doctor who has given up practicing, who acts as a live in buddy for recovering addicts (who have rich parents). Elementary is broadcast in the standard 45min episodes setup.

PILOTBoth shows are high quality productions, and both have their mysteries wrapped up by the time the credits roll. Sherlock however does have some story elements that carry through the episodes, something that is missing from Elementary. Sherlock also seems to use the original material as a basis for much of some of the episodes, cleverly rewritten to take place in the modern world. The Hound of the Baskervilles episode is a good example of this, quite different plot to the original, yet still the same. Elementary doesn’t seem to be using much of the source material, apart from the lead characters. However I’m certainly no Sherlock aficionado so could well be on the wrong track there.

I am enjoying both, but Sherlock is a level higher than Elementary. Elementary seems like the other shows, like Numb3rs, The Mentalist, Law & Order: Criminal Intent and other crime dramas, where a oddly smart person solves crimes for the police (or as one). While a bit eccentric and very smart, Holmes in Elementary seems not as far different from the other “genius” in the other shows. However Holmes in Sherlock seems to be operating in a totally different world from everyone else, with a level of intellect almost unfathomable.

The longer episodes also lend the BBC the ability to have more intricate puzzles and more twists than the shorter episodes. Carry over characters (Moriaty, Holmes’ brother Mycroft, the landlord, the medical tech) other than just the police contact, Holmes and Watson also let us get more attached to the other people in the Sherlock series.

Overall I enjoy both, and will keep watching them. However I hungrily await the next episode of Sherlock, whilst I watch Elementary when I don’t have higher priority shows to watch (like Sherlock, lol).

Sherlock has 2 series and is confirmed for a third.
Elementary has one series completed but I’m not sure if a second has been confirmed